:: resistance welding ... energy required P = current x current x resistance
this is a gone with the wind spreadsheet estimate of energies used to melt materials in resistance welding
materials in question are as follows
relative energies involved (these are all theoretical calculations, not absolute real world)
voltages /current required
in all of this, it seems graphite is a very interesting material. and it is used as an intermediate material in some commercial welding because the high resistances allow alot of heat to be created with a smaller current (hundreds instead of thousands of amperes)
so if we instead use gouging rods, in theory we could be saving alot of power? in theory? (actually somebody have tried it for fun https://hackaday.com/2011/11/06/diy-spot-welder-can-join-anything-together-even-copper)
what power levels are we looking into for graphite tips?
200 amperes? 400 amperes?
the idea is not new, it is already in industrial use, but maybe not pure graphite like a gouge stick.
materials in question are as follows
melt oC | Kg/m3 | Spec heat J/g.K | fusion J/g | 1 mm3 = g? | |
copper | 1084 | 8940 | 0.380 | 205 | 0.008940 |
nickel | 1453 | 8900 | 0.445 | 297 | 0.008900 |
iron | 1510 | 7800 | 0.449 | 272 | 0.007800 |
Tin | 505 | 7287 | 0.210 | 59 | 0.007287 |
brass | 950 | 8730 | 0.380 | 200 | 0.008730 |
ALU | 933 | 2698 | 0.900 | 396 | 0.002698 |
Steel | 1400 | 7700 | 0.490 | 300 | 0.007700 |
graphite | 3550 | 2300 | 0.710 | 8750 | 0.002300 |
tungsten | 3422 | 19250 | 0.132 | 472 | 0.019250 |
tantalum | 3017 | 16650 | 0.140 | 493 | 0.016650 |
Platinum | 1768 | 21090 | 0.133 | 256 | 0.021090 |
Sn63Pb37 (145nΩ.m) | 183 | 8400 | 0.145 | ? ? ? | 0.008400 |
Sn95Ag05 (137nΩ.m) | 240 | 7400 | 0.145 | ? ? ? | 0.007400 |
Sn97Cu03 (118nΩ.m) | 300 | 7320 | 0.145 | ? ? ? | 0.007320 |
relative energies involved (these are all theoretical calculations, not absolute real world)
Energy to fully melt 1mm3 (J) | Energy to reach 95% of melting point per 1mm3 (J) | Material resistivity nΩ.m |
TEST DISC vol 3.2mm diam x 0.5mm thick = 4.02mm3 - -resistance top to bottom (μΩ) |
Energy to heat TEST DISC to 95% melting (J) | heat generated by TEST DISC @ 3000A current (W) |
5.515 | 3.498 | 17.2 | 0.53 | 12.38 | 4.8 |
8.398 | 5.467 | 69.9 | 2.17 | 19.35 | 19.5 |
7.410 | 5.024 | 97.1 | 3.02 | 17.78 | 27.2 |
1.203 | 0.734 | 109.0 | 3.39 | 2.60 | 30.5 |
4.898 | 2.994 | 63.0 | 1.96 | 10.60 | 17.6 |
3.334 | 2.152 | 28.2 | 0.88 | 7.62 | 7.9 |
7.592 | 5.018 | 170.0 | 5.29 | 17.76 | 47.6 |
25.922 | 5.507 | 9500.0 | 295.40 | 19.50 | 2658.6 |
17.781 | 8.261 | 50.0 | 1.55 | 29.24 | 14.0 |
15.241 | 6.681 | 130.0 | 4.04 | 23.65 | 36.4 |
10.358 | 4.711 | 1100.0 | 34.20 | 16.68 | 307.8 |
? ? ? | 0.212 | 145.0 | 4.51 | 0.75 | 40.6 |
? ? ? | 0.245 | 137.0 | 4.26 | 0.87 | 38.3 |
? ? ? | 0.302 | 118.0 | 3.67 | 1.07 | 33.0 |
voltage to create 3000A (top to bottom) | voltage to heat TEST DISC to 95% melting in 1s | current for 1s heating |
0.00159 | 0.00256 | 4836 |
0.00650 | 0.00648 | 2986 |
0.00906 | 0.00733 | 2426 |
0.01017 | 0.00297 | 875 |
0.00587 | 0.00456 | 2325 |
0.00264 | 0.00259 | 2942 |
0.01587 | 0.00969 | 1833 |
0.88620 | 0.07590 | 257 |
0.00466 | 0.00673 | 4345 |
0.01213 | 0.00977 | 2421 |
0.10260 | 0.02388 | 698 |
0.01353 | 0.00184 | 408 |
0.01277 | 0.00193 | 451 |
0.01100 | 0.00198 | 540 |
so if we instead use gouging rods, in theory we could be saving alot of power? in theory? (actually somebody have tried it for fun https://hackaday.com/2011/11/06/diy-spot-welder-can-join-anything-together-even-copper)
what power levels are we looking into for graphite tips?
thermal conductivity W/m.K | Energy limit as holder for gouge stick. Self heating to melt limit (0.185g) | voltage needed to create TEST DISC 95% melt heat using 0.185g gouge probe | Current needed to create TEST DISC 95% melt heat using 0.185g gouger | 100A into 0.185g gouge heating time to 95% melt TEST DISC (s) | 100A powered 0.74g gouger heating time to 95% melt TEST DISC (s) | Mohs hardness |
400 | 135 | 0.0780 | 44.8 | 2.6913 | 0.4421 | 3.0 |
91 | 181 | 0.0975 | 56.1 | 4.2065 | 0.6911 | 4.0 |
80 | 188 | 0.0935 | 53.7 | 3.8652 | 0.6350 | 4.0 |
67 | 63 | 0.0357 | 20.6 | 0.5652 | 0.0929 | 3.0 |
109 | 119 | 0.0722 | 41.5 | 2.3043 | 0.3786 | 3.5 |
235 | 116 | 0.0612 | 35.2 | 1.6565 | 0.2721 | 2.8 |
66 | 175 | 0.0934 | 53.7 | 3.8609 | 0.6343 | 5.5 |
140 | 443 | 0.0979 | 56.3 | 4.2391 | 0.6964 | 1.0 |
72 | 427 | 0.1199 | 68.9 | 6.3565 | 1.0443 | 7.5 |
170 | 376 | 0.1078 | 62.0 | 5.1413 | 0.8446 | 6.5 |
72 | 221 | 0.0905 | 52.1 | 3.6261 | 0.5957 | 3.5 |
50 | 23 | 0.0192 | 11.0 | 0.1630 | 0.0268 | 3.5 |
65 | 30 | 0.0206 | 11.9 | 0.1891 | 0.0311 | 3.5 |
65 | 37 | 0.0229 | 13.2 | 0.2326 | 0.0382 | 3.5 |
Energy limit as holder for gouge stick. Self heating to melt limit (0.74g) | 200A into 0.74g gouge heating time to 95% melt TEST DISC (s) | voltage to push 200A thru 0.74g gouge | 400A into 0.74g gouge heating time to 95% melt TEST DISC (s) | voltage to push 400A thru 0.74g gouge |
541 | 0.1105 | 0.56011 | 0.0276 | 1.1202 |
725 | 0.1728 | 0.56043 | 0.0432 | 1.1209 |
754 | 0.1588 | 0.56060 | 0.0397 | 1.1212 |
252 | 0.0232 | 0.56068 | 0.0058 | 1.1214 |
474 | 0.0946 | 0.56039 | 0.0237 | 1.1208 |
466 | 0.0680 | 0.56018 | 0.0170 | 1.1204 |
699 | 0.1586 | 0.56106 | 0.0396 | 1.1221 |
1772 | 0.1741 | 0.61908 | 0.0435 | 1.2382 |
1708 | 0.2611 | 0.56031 | 0.0653 | 1.1206 |
1506 | 0.2112 | 0.56081 | 0.0528 | 1.1216 |
882 | 0.1489 | 0.56684 | 0.0372 | 1.1337 |
91 | 0.0067 | 0.56090 | 0.0017 | 1.1218 |
120 | 0.0078 | 0.56085 | 0.0019 | 1.1217 |
150 | 0.0096 | 0.56073 | 0.0024 | 1.1215 |
Comments
Post a Comment
feel free to ask me anything